Legal Opinion
In Re Warner
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 17, 2009No. 2005-B-1303PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAWYER DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
VICTORY, J. *
|, This disciplinary matter originated with a complaint alleging that respondents Ivan David Warner and Steven Joseph Rando had breached the confidentiality rule imposed upon participants in an attorney disciplinary proceeding by La. S.Ct. Rule XIX, § 16. In defense, the respondents argued that the confidentiality rule for attorney disciplinary proceedings violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. For the reasons which follow, we find that the confidentiality rule does indeed violate the First Amendment, as it constitutes an…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DraughterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
- MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. QBE Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
- State ex rel. J.M.Supreme Court of Florida · 2014
- City of New Orleans v. Lawrence ClarkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.