Legal Opinion

State Of Washington, Resp. v. Matthew Hampton, App.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 11, 2014No. 69601-7Published

1Opinion of the Court

b 1,-,; c Ui" ;.'ir''.b! in\ 20MUG il AH 10= |8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, DIVISION ONE Respondent, No. 69601-7-1 v. MATTHEW ALEXANDER HAMPTON, PUBLISHED OPINION Appellant. FILED: August 11, 2014 Dwyer, J.—"[T]he Sixth Amendment guarantees a defendant the right to be represented by an otherwise qualified attorney whom that defendant can afford to hire, or who is willing to represent the defendant even though he is without funds." Caplin & Drvsdale, Chartered v. United States, 491 U.S. 617, 624-25, 109 S. Ct. 2646,

105 L. Ed. 2d 528

(1989). This right…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API