Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. City of Black River Falls
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed June 20, 1927:
Doerfler, J.
Where a city engages in a project such as the furnishing of electric light, power, or water for the benefit of its inhabitants, upon a consideration to be paid for such service, the function so performed by the municipality is proprietary and not governmental. Eau Claire Dells Imp. Co. v. Eau Claire, 172 Wis. 240, 179 N. W. 2; Milwaukee v. Raulf, 164 Wis. 172, 159 N. W. 819; West Bend v. West Bend H. & L. Co. 186 Wis. 184, 202 N. W. 350. Ordinarily a city engaged in its proprietary capacity “may exercise such powers as a private…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peterson v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Eau Claire Dells Improvement Co. v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Athearn v. Independent District of MillersburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- City of Milwaukee v. RaulfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Kneeland v. GilmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Village of McFarland v. Town of DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Journal Printing Co. v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- H. Hohensee Construction Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935