State v. Harry
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtKonduros, J.
Kareem Harry appeals his murder conviction under the hand of one is the hand of all theory of accomplice liability. He argues the circuit court erred in denying his motion for directed verdict, as the State failed to present any direct or substantial circumstantial evidence he acted in concert with Saire Castro, his associate and friend, who admitted shooting the victim and pled guilty to voluntary manslaughter. We affirm.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Harry was dating a woman, Ashley Bledsoe, with whom he had a tumultuous relationship. According to Bledsoe, she and Harry dated for about eight or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brightman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. HepburnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- State v. CannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
- State v. DelestreSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
- State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HarrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- State v. HarrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017