Legal Opinion

Young v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided September 6, 2006No. 17646-83, 4201-84, 22783-85, 30010-85; 35608-86, 19464-92, 621-94, 9532-94Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

HOYT W. AND BARBARA D. YOUNG, ET AL., 1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Young v. Comm'r

No. 17646-83, 4201-84, 22783-85, 30010-85; 35608-86, 19464-92, 621-94, 9532-94

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2006-189; 2006 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 192; 92 T.C.M. (CCH) 228;

September 6, 2006, Filed

Dixon v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo 2006-97, 2006 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 98 (T.C., 2006)

Robert Alan Jones, for petitioners in docket Nos. 17646- 83, 19464-92, 621-94, and 9532-94.

Henry E. O'Neill and Peter R. Hochman, for respondent.

Beghe, Renato

RENATO BEGHE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BEGHE, Judge: These cases…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API