Chicago, B. & QR Co. v. United States
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
The plaintiffs and numerous interested parties who have been permitted to intervene as plaintiffs seek a decree declaring null and void an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission entered December 11, 1944, and a permanent injunction restraining, enjoining and suspending the execution and enforcement thereof. 38 Stat. 208, 219, 220, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 41(8), 41(28), 43 and 48.
The relief sought by the plaintiffs is opposed by the defendant, United States, and by the intervening defendants, Interstate Commerce Commission, Railroad Commission of Kentucky, Kentucky Coal Agency…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State of Florida v. United States Brooks-Scanlon Corporation v. Same. Wilson Lumber Co. Of Florida v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Norfolk Southern Bus Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1950
- Chicago & E. I. R. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1952
- Beard-Laney, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1949
- Osick v. PUBLIC EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF IDAHOIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- State of New York v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.