Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Dooley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 5, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. O. T. Reeves, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtWall, P. J.

This was an action of assumpsit upon an account, mainly for services rendered by the plaintiff to the defendant. There was a verdict for plaintiff for $326, of which $18.75 was remitted, and the court, overruling a motion for a new trial, rendered judgment for the residue, $307.25. That the plaintiff rendered valuable service to the defendant is not questioned, but there is conflict as to the compensation to be made therefor; the one insisting that it was agreed upon at $20 per month, and the other that it was fixed at $150 per year. The court, in this state of the case, permitted the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Phillips v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. LuckmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Humphreys v. OrreyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921
  3. Gschwendtner v. GebhardtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API