Legal Opinion
Straley v. Universal Uranium & Milling Corp.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of California
Decided March 24, 1960No. 20742PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKER, District Judge.
This is a civil action brought by William Thomas Straley, Ruth R. Straley, and William Reynolds Straley, under the *942Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C.A. §§ 77a-77aa) to recover the consideration paid for stock sold in violation of the Act. 15 U.S.C.A. § 77e provides that it is unlawful to use the mails or interstate commerce in the sale of certain unregistered securities. 15 U.S.C.A. § 771 (1) provides that the seller of securities in violation of Section 77e is liable to the purchaser who sues to recover the consideration paid. 15 U.S. C.A. § 77m provides that no action…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- A. C. Frost & Co. v. Coeur D'Alene Mines Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Adams v. AlbanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McMerty v. BurtnessDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1976
- Straley v. Universal Uranium & Milling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Straley v. Universal Uranium and Milling CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Straley v. Universal Uranium & Milling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Straley v. Universal Uranium and Milling CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962