Legal Opinion

Anschutz Co. v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided March 13, 2006No. 6169-03Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ANSCHUTZ COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Anschutz Co. v. Comm'r

No. 6169-03

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2006-40; 2006 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 40; 91 T.C.M. (CCH) 860;

March 13, 2006., Filed

John W. Bonds, Jr., Andrew B. Clubok, Thomas L. Evans, Matthew J. Gries, Todd F. Maynes, Herbert N. Beller, Mark B. Hamilton, and Tony Y. Lam, for petitioners.

Virginia L. Hamilton and Michael C. Prindible, for respondent.

Haines, Harry A.

Harry A. Haines

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

HAINES, Judge: Respondent determined the following deficiencies in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Crane v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Brown v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Commissioner v. Idaho Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API