Legal Opinion

Hill v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided April 9, 1979No. Docket No. 1790-78Unpublished

Held, petitioner is not entitled to use the income averaging provisions for computing his 1976 income tax under secs. 1301-1305, I.R.C. 1954.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES M. HILL, JR., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Hill v. Commissioner

Docket No. 1790-78.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1979-133; 1979 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 390; 38 T.C.M. (CCH) 595; T.C.M. (RIA) 79133;

April 9, 1979, Filed

Held, petitioner is not entitled to use the income averaging provisions for computing his 1976 income tax under secs. 1301-1305, I.R.C. 1954.

James M. Hill, Jr., pro se.

Joel V. Williamson, for the respondent.

WILES

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

WILES, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency of $249 in petitioner's 1976 Federal income tax.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Unser v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  2. Sharvy v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  3. Frost v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API