Legal Opinion

Mexican Central Railway Co. v. Gehr

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 29, 1896PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Trespass on the Case, for malicious prosecution with counts in trespass for false imprisonment. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Charles G. Neely, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1896.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

• This was an action on the case, brought by appellee against appellant.

The declaration consisted of four counts, all for the same alleged cause of action—an arrest and imprisonment in the city of Mexico. The first and second counts allege a malicious prosecution, the third and fourth a false imprisonment. The defendant filed the general issue and two special pleas.

The special pleas set up that the laws of Mexico provided for the institution of criminal proceedings by two methods, to wit, ex ojficio, by the public officers, and by complaint; and that the proceedings which resulted in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blalock v. RandallIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. TuiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  3. Cudahy v. PowellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
  4. Kellogg Newspaper Co. v. PetersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sigmon v. . ShellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Jacobson v. RolleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Ferrell v. LivingstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  4. Conkling v. WhitmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  5. Liogas v. LowenguthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API