Legal Opinion

Madraso v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 29, 1994No. 92-2434PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Madraso appeals from his convictions and sentences for attempted first-degree murder with a firearm and unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.

The primary claims of trial error arise from alleged prosecutorial improprieties in the opening statement and final argument 1 and the allegedly erroneous admission of evidence of flight. While we are inclined *750to agree that error has indeed been demonstrated on these issues, we must conclude— on the basis of the overwhelming, indeed undisputed, evidence against the appellant— that the incidents in question were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. State v. MurraySupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. State v. BetancourtSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  4. Lamont v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nathan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API