Legal Opinion

Culliford v. Gomila

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 29, 1888No. 33PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

128 U.S. 135 (1888)

CULLIFORD

v.

GOMILA.

No. 33.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 18, 19, 1888.

Decided October 29, 1888.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA.

Mr. J.R. Beckwith for appellant. Mr. J. McConnell also filed a brief for the same.

Mr. J.D. Rouse for appellees. Mr. William Grant and Mr. J. Ward Gurley, Jr., were with him on the brief.

MR. JUSTICE BLATCHFORD, after stating the case as above reported, delivered the opinion of the court.

We are of opinion that the Circuit Court ought to have dismissed the libel, and that its decree…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Filley v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Culliford v. GomilaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Talge Mahogany Co. v. NicklasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API