Legal Opinion

Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance v. GEICO

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant GEICO is obligated to defend and indemnify the defendant Menachem Horowitz with respect to an accident which occurred on February 15, 1996, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated April 24, 1997, which denied its motion for summary judgment, awarded summary judgment in favor of GEICO pursuant to CPLR 3212 (b), and held that GEICO had no obligation to defend or indemnify Menachem Horowitz with respect to the underlying action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Green v. DawsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  3. Webb v. State Farm Mutual Ins.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API