Legal Opinion

Mattila v. Hedrick

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 25, 1984No. A8111-07213; CA A27653PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff sued defendants for declaratory relief. Defendants counter-claimed. A document entitled “Stipulations” contains an order of the court dated January 4, 1983, that states:

“1. Reino Mattila’s motions for costs and attorney’s fees against Bonnie Pfannensteil and Betty Riley are dismissed;
“2. This action for declaratory relief is dismissed as to Bonnie Pfannenstiel and Betty Riley;
“3. All counterclaims by Bonnie Pfannenstiel and/or Betty Riley against Reino Mattila are dismissed;
“5. Each party is to bear their own costs and attorney fees.”

An order of the court dated February 18, 1983,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Portland v. Carriage InnOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oregonians Against Trapping v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Bonner v. KrauseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API