Legal Opinion
Mattila v. Hedrick
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 25, 1984No. A8111-07213; CA A27653PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff sued defendants for declaratory relief. Defendants counter-claimed. A document entitled “Stipulations” contains an order of the court dated January 4, 1983, that states:
“1. Reino Mattila’s motions for costs and attorney’s fees against Bonnie Pfannensteil and Betty Riley are dismissed;
“2. This action for declaratory relief is dismissed as to Bonnie Pfannenstiel and Betty Riley;
“3. All counterclaims by Bonnie Pfannenstiel and/or Betty Riley against Reino Mattila are dismissed;
“5. Each party is to bear their own costs and attorney fees.”
An order of the court dated February 18, 1983,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of Portland v. Carriage InnOregon Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by2 opinions
- Oregonians Against Trapping v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Bonner v. KrauseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984