M.H. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Judge.
We affirm an order adjudicating Appellant delinquent. Appellant contends that it was error to deny his motion for discharge, arguing that the state failed to file the petition within 45 days of the date he was “taken into custody” as required by section 39.048(6), Florida Statutes, as then in effect. Appellant asserts that he was, in fact, “taken into custody” on the date the offense was committed.
At the hearing on Appellant’s motion, Officer Smith testified that he and other officers arrived at the scene of a reported burglary in progress and observed Appellant and other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. ChristianDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- State v. M.S.S.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- In the Interest of S.V.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- State v. F.T.H.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- R.F. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001