Legal Opinion

M.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 11, 1994No. 93-0995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Judge.

We affirm an order adjudicating Appellant delinquent. Appellant contends that it was error to deny his motion for discharge, arguing that the state failed to file the petition within 45 days of the date he was “taken into custody” as required by section 39.048(6), Florida Statutes, as then in effect. Appellant asserts that he was, in fact, “taken into custody” on the date the offense was committed.

At the hearing on Appellant’s motion, Officer Smith testified that he and other officers arrived at the scene of a reported burglary in progress and observed Appellant and other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ChristianDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. State v. M.S.S.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. In the Interest of S.V.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. State v. F.T.H.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. R.F. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API