In re Reilly
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1961. He maintained an office in the City of Rensselaer until he was suspended from practice for a period of six months by decision dated December 8, 1994 (Matter of Reilly, 210 AD2d 696). Respondent has not applied for reinstatement.
By petition dated January 4, 1995, petitioner Committee on Professional Standards accused respondent of neglecting an estate and misleading and deceiving petitioner in its investigation of the alleged neglect. The alleged misconduct occurred prior to respondent’s six-month suspension. After a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994