Legal Opinion
Higgins v. California Prune & Apricot Grower, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 3, 1924No. 33PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
On the former hearing (282 F. 550) this court reversed a decree dismissing the bill on its face, and sent the cause back for a hearing, whence it now comes after decree for the plaintiff in accordance with our decision. Meanwhile the Supreme Court has decided the ease of Kline v. Burke Construction Co., 260 U. S. 226, 43 S. Ct. 79, 67 L. Ed. 226, 24 A. L. R. 1077, holding that in eircum-siances like those at bar a federal court has no right, in the face of section 265 of the Judicial Code (Comp. St. § 1242), to enjoin an action in the state court. The District…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Lee v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Johnson v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Southern Railway Co. v. CliftSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Olga Zdanok v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division, Frank T. Alexander v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Lawrence Roth v. Bank of the CommonwealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- De Johnson v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Columbia Plaza Corporation v. Security National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.