Legal Opinion

Agricultural Insurance v. Holter

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swerston

The determinative question in this case is whether or not an umpire was selected in accordance with the provisions of a fire insurance contract to be referred to hereinafter. Said provision is as follows:

“Appraisal. In the case the insured and this company shall fail to agree as to the actual cash value or the amount of loss, then, on the written demand of either, each shall select a competent and disinterested appraiser and notify the other of the appraiser selected within twenty days of such demand. The appraisers shall first select a competent and disinterested umpire; and failing for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powers Dry Goods Co. v. Imperial Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Kavli v. Eagle Star Insurance Co. Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Phillips v. LandessTennessee Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Agricultural Insurance v. HolterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
  2. State of Tennessee v. Timothy Laquan Davis, Jr. and Braze Roland RuckerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API