In Re the Marriage of Huth

I concur in the majority opinion of Judge Neal as to the duties of the trial judge in granting a motion to correct errors and in the result reached in this case. I also agree that the original trial judge1 could have considered the property transferred to Richard’s mother as a marital asset on the ground the transfer was fraudulent. However, I do not agree with the majority’s statement that the trial judge in this case could have set aside the fraudulent conveyance.

The trial court in a dissolution proceeding may not enter a decree which disposes of or affects property rights or interests of a…