Legal Opinion

Remington v. Arndt

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 7, 1969No. File 160413PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRubinow, J.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile operated by the defendant Arndt; that that automobile crashed into an automobile operated by the defendant Rodriquez which was stationary in the highway and blocking it; and that the plaintiff was injured as a result of the negligence of the defendants.

The defendant Rodriquez, hereinafter called the defendant, pleaded, as a second defense, that a proximate cause of any injury sustained by the plaintiff was the plaintiff’s negligence in failing to fasten his seat belt. The plaintiff has demurred to this second defense.

In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Smithwick v. Hall & Upson Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1890

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Miller v. HaynesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Breault v. Ford Motor CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Delott v. RorabackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Dunn v. DursoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  5. Pritts v. Walter Lowery Trucking CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API