Commonwealth v. Danton
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
The defendant was found guilty of the larceny of fifty rugs, the property of Henry O. Marcy. At the trial the Commonwealth, against the defendant’s exception, offered in evidence a small bottle and a label taken from it, upon which was written, “November 2, 1919, 12 tabs. F. L. P. One after each meal dissolved in water, Dr. Danton.” The label was in the handwriting of the defendant. He testified that he was not registered to practise medicine in this Commonwealth, that he did not “write a prescription, that this was medicine which he gave to a friend.” He was further cross-examined by the Com*553m…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Commonwealth v. HomerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Commonwealth v. GorhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Commonwealth v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Commonwealth v. BellinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Commonwealth v. DominicoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Commonwealth v. WestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Commonwealth v. BinkiewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.