Legal Opinion
People v. Gould
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 11, 1888PublishedCited by 20 opinions
Error to Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Respondent was convicted of seduction, and sentenced to pay a fine of $300, and in default of payment to be imprisoned for three years in the State House of Correction and Reformatory at Ionia. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The respondent in this pause was convicted in the circuit court for the county of Shiawassee, for seducing- and debauching one Kate Morrow, and brings the case hero on writ of error.
*241The action was brought under section 9283, How. Stat., which provides:
“If any man shall seduce and debauch any unmarried woman, he shall be punished by imprisonment in the State prison not more than five years,” etc. •
The information charges—
“ That on October 10, 1886, at the township of Shiawassee, in the county of Shiawassee, [said William Gould] did seduce and debauch one Kate Morrow; she, the same Kate Morrow,…
2Cited by20 opinions
- State v. BringgoldWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. SteinmetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- People v. StreetMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- State v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.