Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Cherry

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1876PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Contracts. Vendor and purchaser. Fraud. Equity. Practice in the superior court. Damages. Before Judge Hill. Bibb Superior Court. October Adjourned Term, 1875. The following, taken in connection with the above head-notes, sufficiently reports this case : Cherry brought case against Gilbert for failure to comply with the following written contract: “GEORGIA — Bibb County.

Read the full summary

Contracts. Vendor and purchaser. Fraud. Equity. Practice in the superior court. Damages. Before Judge Hill. Bibb Superior Court. October Adjourned Term, 1875. The following, taken in connection with the above head-notes, sufficiently reports this case : Cherry brought case against Gilbert for failure to comply with the following written contract: “GEORGIA — Bibb County. “The undersigned have this day entered into the following agreement: William A. Cherry agrees to sell J. L. Gilbert his plantation,'consisting of about eight hundred acres, part in wooc\s and part in open land, situate in Bibb…

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Judge.

The facts of this case and the ruling of the court thereon, are sufficiently expressed in the head-notes to be understood, if the reporter will append the full written contract and the pleadings; and further elaboration is deemed unnecessary.

Judgment reversed.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Lanier House Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  2. Dannelly v. Cuthbert Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Harris v. McClainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Render v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  5. Shives v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API