Legal Opinion

Plante v. City of Medford

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 7, 1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

Plante, formerly acting chief of the Medford fire department, seeks declaratory relief against the city and the city manager to determine whether, in the circumstances mentioned below, he is entitled to a retirement allowance of $5,135, which amounts to sixty-five per cent of the chief’s annual compensation at the time of Plante’s retirement. The trial judge made findings (adopted as a report of material facts) and concluded that Plante’s retirement allowance should not be based upon sixty-five per cent of the chief’s salary. From a final decree maldng a declaration to this effect, Plante…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. People Ex Rel. Albright v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  4. Bates v. McLeodWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Albernaz v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City Manager of Medford v. State Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API