Missouri Pacific Transportation Co. v. Moody

The appellant states the points raised upon this appeal as follows:

“First:’ The court erred in not permitting the defendant to use Dr. Price to testify as to the plaintiff’s condition when he treated her after she testified as to the doctor’s diagnosis.

‘ ‘ Second: There was no issne in the evidence to go to the jury on the question of whether or not there was negligence in stopping the'bus at that point, which was wrongfully submitted in instruction No. 5A.

“Third: It was prejudicial error for the court to announce in open court before the jury that someone was talking to the witnesses and…