Legal Opinion
State v. Connery
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 1989No. Cr. 880274PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
Kevin Connery appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of a controlled substance in violation of § 19-03.1-23, N.D.C.C. We affirm.
At approximately 8 p.m. on November 1, 1987, Highway Patrol Officer Scott Brand stopped a vehicle driven by Connery- on Highway 83 north of Bismarck because of a speeding violation. After obtaining Connery’s driver’s license, Brand returned to his patrol car, completed a traffic citation, and returned to Connery’s vehicle with a flashlight to have him sign the citation. Brand noticed an…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. MurchisonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. EldredNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. RitterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MurrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SyvertsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.