Legal Opinion
Bio-Tech Mills, Inc. v. Jorling
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Anthony V. Cardona, J.
This is an application by petitioner, Bio-Tech Mills, Inc., for an award of counsel fees and other expenses pursuant to CPLR article 86, known as the New York State Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). In December 1990, petitioner commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7803 (1) seeking an order in the nature of mandamus directing respondent, the Commissioner of the New York State Depart*620ment of Environmental Conservation, to process petitioner’s reapplication in December 1984, for a State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bio-Tech Mills, Inc. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- MATTER OF BIO-TECH MILLS, INC. v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Flacke v. Bio-Tech Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scibilia v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Cross-Sound Ferry Services, Inc. v. Department of TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Centennial Restorations Co. v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Serio v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995