Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David v. Moss

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2017No. 2013AP002088-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review a report filed by Referee James C. Boll recommending that the court reinstate the license of David V. Moss to practice law in Wisconsin. Upon careful review of the matter, we agree that Attorney Moss's license should be reinstated, with the conditions described herein. We further agree with the referee that Attorney Moss should be required to pay the full costs of the reinstatement proceeding, which are $3,321.79 as of May 22, 2017.

¶ 2. Attorney Moss was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 2009 and practiced in Galesville. Attorney Moss currently lives in the state of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David v. MossWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David v. MossWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API