Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Kane
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 11, 1993No. 76587Published
1Opinion of the Court
852 P.2d 717 (1993)
Linda WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Matthew KANE, Jr., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 76587.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
May 11, 1993.
Gary L. Bracken, Ponca City, for plaintiff-appellant.
Jesse J. Worten, III, John M. Keefer, Brewer, Worten, Robinett, Johnson, Worten & King, Bartlesville, for defendant-appellee.
OPALA, Justice.
The dispositive question here is whether Linda Wilson's [plaintiff's or Wilson's] claim against Matthew Kane, Jr. [Kane], personal representative of her uncle's estate, for his alleged "conversion" of certain nonprobate assets by mismanagement could have been…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.