United States v. Collier
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.
At the conclusion of the evidence in this case, the Court denied interest on the recovery. This denial was based on the idea that the Court had discretion in granting or not granting interest on a recovery. That is the Tennessee rule. See generally, Farmers Chemical Ass’n, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty, 421 F.2d 319 (6th Cir. 1970). Also, the Court was of the opinion that principles of equity would require a decision to not allow interest. This view was based on the decision of United States v. City of Los Angeles, 336 F.Supp. 1014 (C.D.Cal.1972). We…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Farmers Chemical Ass'n v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1972