Lichtman v. Village of Kiryas Joel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff Akiva Lichtman (hereinafter the plaintiff) slipped and fell on a patch of ice in a municipal parking lot of the defendant, Village of Kiryas Joel, allegedly sustaining injuries. The Supreme Court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The Village demonstrated its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting proof that there was no prior written notice of the existence of the icy condition (see Village Law § 6-628; CPLR 9804). Thus, in order to defeat the Village’s motion, the plaintiffs were required to come forward…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Groninger v. Village of MamaroneckNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- San Marco v. Village/Town of Mount KiscoNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Petrillo v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Kiszenik v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Groninger v. Village of MamaroneckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Smith v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- David v. Chong Sun LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Cuebas v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Lima v. Village of Garden CityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Keating v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.