Legal Opinion
Strauss v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 8, 1969No. Nos. 16881, 17203PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge.
The petitioner, Robert Strauss, filed two applications for a writ of habeas corpus in the district court, one on November 9, 1967 and the other on July 29, 1968. In No. 16881 the application for a writ was denied and petitioner appeals. In No. 17203 petitioner sought to mandamus Judge Dillin for failure to act on his second application for a writ. Subsequently, Judge Dillin denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus and the mandamus was construed as an appeal from the denial of the ha-beas corpus writ and was consolidated with No. 16881.
On October 27,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hyser v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Charles H. Phillips v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- James William Johnson v. Richard A. Chappell, Chairman U. S. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Robert Samuel Strauss v. James J. Moos, U.S. Marshall, Southern District of Illinois, and Joseph N. Shore, U.S. Parole BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Rmi Company Nl Industries, Inc. v. Hon. Daniel J. Snyder, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- O'BRIEN v. HendersonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973
- O'Brien v. HendersonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973
- Robert L. Strauss v. P. G. Smith, Warden U. S. Penitentiary, Terre Haute, Indiana, and Joseph Shore, United States Parole Board, Robert L. Strauss v. Honorable S. Hugh Dillin, U. S. District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- The Clorox Company v. The United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.