Legal Opinion

Friendly v. Elwert

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1909Published

From Multnomah: Thomas O’Day, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice McBride. On January 22, 1907, defendant C. M. Elwert entered into an agreement with F. V. Andrews & Co. for the sale of certain property in Portland.

Read the full summary

From Multnomah: Thomas O’Day, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice McBride. On January 22, 1907, defendant C. M. Elwert entered into an agreement with F. V. Andrews & Co. for the sale of certain property in Portland. The agreement, omitting the description of the property, is as follows: “January 22, 1907. Received of F. V. Andrews & Co., agents, the sum of three hundred ($300) dollars on account of purchase price of ten thousand ($10,000) dollars, for the following real property, in the city of Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon; * * terms of sale are as follows: I am to furnish complete and…

1Opinion

*607Decided November 29, 1910.

On Petition foe Rehearing.

[Ill Pac. 690.]

Opinion

2Per curiam

After a careful re-examination of this case, we are satisfied that the conclusion reached in our former opinion (105 Pac. 404) is correct, and we adhere thereto.

Reversed: Rehearing Denied.

Decided January 31, 1911.

On Motion to Vacate Decree.

[112 Pac. 1085.]

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Eakin.

After the mandate in this case had been issued, plaintiff filed a petition, asking that it be recalled and a rehearing granted, on the ground that the decree should have provided that plaintiff recover the $800 earnest payment made by…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Litz v. GooslingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  2. Berry v. FrisbieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  3. Rude v. LevySupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. Cummins v. BeaversSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  5. Friendly v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API