Hahamovitch v. Hahamovitch
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The wife appeals an amended final judgment entered in this dissolution action, arguing that 1) the trial court erred by finding the parties’ prenuptial agreement to be valid; 2) even if the prenuptial agreement was valid, the trial court erred in its interpretation of it; 3) the trial court erred with respect to the child support award; and 4) the trial court erred in curtailing discovery. The husband cross-appeals two of the trial court’s rulings in connection with the validity of the prenuptial agreement, but we construe these as alternative arguments for upholding the prenuptial…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Del Vecchio v. Del VecchioSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Posner v. PosnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Belcher v. BelcherSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Casto v. CastoSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dianne L. Hahamovitch n/k/a Dianne Lynn Hahamovitch v. Harry H. HahamovitchSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
- Carole Ann Berg v. Roy Timothy YoungDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Elbaum v. ElbaumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Felice v. FeliceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Felice v. FeliceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.