Legal Opinion

Howard v. M/V Bristol Monarch

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 3, 1987No. C85-986MPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

McGOVERN, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Howard brings this action in admiralty for personal injuries (two fractured vertebrae and a fractured left heel). The causes of action are negligence under the Jones Act and unseaworthiness. No jury demand has been made. The facts concerning how Howard sustained these injuries are not in dispute, and the Court’s decision concerning Defendants’ liability does not turn on witness credibility or demeanor; summary judgment is, therefore, appropriate.

FACTS

Howard was a seafood processor aboard the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. O'Donnell v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Jackson v. Pittsburgh S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hale v. Maersk Line LimitedSupreme Court of Virginia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API