Legal Opinion

George v. Farmers' & Merchants' National Bank

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 21, 1928No. [No. 35, April Term, 1928.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

In 1920 a judgment was entered against the appellant and Nathaniel B. Harper her husband on a confessed judg ment note, which was later stricken out and the case put on the trial docket. This case was subsequently tried and resulted in a verdict and judgment for the present appellant, Agnes H. Harper. An appeal was taken to this court, which was heard and resulted in a reversal of the judgment; at the conclusion of the opinion the court saying: “Judgment reversed, with costs to the appellant.” (See Farmers’ & Mchts. Nat. Bank v. Harper, 151 Md. 358.) Later, upon petition, a reargument was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  2. Gott v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1834
  3. Kent v. RicardsHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1850
  4. State v. F. B. Williams Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  5. McGrath v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Couser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. Balducci v. EberlyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Harrison v. HarrisonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Giessman v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  5. Jonathan Murray v. Universal Parking and Transportation, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API