Legal Opinion

Maria Groeschel v. Benevity International Inc.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 24, 2026No. 2:24-cv-01686Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 MARIA GROESCHEL, an individual, CASE NO. 2:24-cv-01686-JNW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 9 MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY v. AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 10 MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER BENEVITY INTERNATIONAL INC., a 11 foreign corporation, 12 Defendant. 13 14 1. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Maria Groeschel pursues discrimination and state-law contract 15 16 claims against her former employer, Benevity International Inc. (“Benevity”). Trial is set for April 6, 2026, and the discovery deadline was November 7, 2025.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Pomona v. Sqm North America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Geraldine Marie Blodgett, in Re Hector C. Perez, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. v. Merck KGaADistrict Court, S.D. California · 1999
  4. Ramey v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API