Dunsmore v. Co-Operative Fire Ins. Ass'n of Vermont
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.
The plaintiffs were issued a standard fire insurance policy covering farm property by the defendant company to which a so-called “Machinery Floater Form” was attached. By this form the movable farm machinery listed in the schedule of the policy was insured against loss or damage directly resulting from certain specified hazards. One such peril and the one with which we are concerned here reads as follows:
“Collision or derailment or overturn of a vehicle while the insured property is being legally transported on a public highway.”
The facts are undisputed. One item in the schedule of property…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gloucester Ferry Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Cross-Abbott Company v. Howard's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- Noyes v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- Fish v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- People v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by6 opinions
- Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- State v. Glens Falls Insurance Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1975
- Allen Engineering, Inc. v. Summit Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- Martin v. ShepardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.