Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 24, 1993No. 270-89LPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBINSON, Judge.

This matter is before the court upon the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to RCFC 56. Plaintiff claims that defendant violated the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution when, as a result of a condemnation proceeding involving a tract of land in Pennsylvania, it took plaintiff’s property without compensation. J. Nevin White Lumber Co. (White), identified in the condemnation proceeding as the record owner of the land, and Chicago Title Insurance Co. of Maryland, White’s title insurer, are third-party defendants. After careful review of the parties’…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API