Legal Opinion

Prezioso v. Prezioso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Orange County (Klein, J.), dated June 3, 2011, which, after a fact-finding hearing, found that the husband did not commit a family offense.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal from the fact-finding order is deemed to be an application for leave to appeal from the fact-finding order, and leave to appeal is granted (see Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]); and it is further,

Ordered that the fact-finding order is reversed, on the law, without…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rubackin v. RubackinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ramos v. CaceresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Matter of Tyler v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Prezioso v. PreziosoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Prezioso v. PreziosoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Ramos v. CaceresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API