Legal Opinion

UPS Worldwide Forwarding, Inc. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge FLAHERTY.

UPS Worldwide Forwarding, Inc. (Taxpayer) appeals from four orders of the Board of Finance and Revenue (Board) which refused Taxpayer’s request to have its Corporate Net Income Tax (CNI Tax) and Franchise Tax for the years 1996 and 1997 recalculated by including a payroll factor along with the property factor and sales factor in the tax apportionment formula found in the Tax Reform Code of 1971 (Tax Reform Code). 1 We affirm.

Initially, we note that the Franchise Tax is not a tax on property or capital assets, but a tax on the privilege of doing business in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Tool Sales & Service Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. American Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Shawnee Development, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. UPS Worldwide Forwarding, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API