Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Curry

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1984No. 13988PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Justice.

Albert and Carolyn Schneider filed suit against Edward Curry to collect on a promissory note. The district court entered judgment for the Schneiders. We affirm.

Three issues are raised in this appeal. First, should the Schneiders’ attorney have been disqualified because of allegedly un ethical behavior? Second, did the district court err by failing to recognize the right to an offset claimed by Curry? Third, are the Schneiders entitled to attorney fees on appeal?

The Schneiders met Curry in the fall of 1977 and expressed an interest in purchasing a bar which he owned in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Sorenson v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hale v. HeningerIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Johnson v. AlbertIdaho Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kohn v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Parsons v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Harmston v. Agro-West, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. KirkwoodIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Feld v. Idaho Crop Improvement Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API