Holland v. State

Ruffin, Judge.

A jury found David Holland, Jr. guilty of theft by taking. In his sole enumeration of error on appeal, Holland argues that the evidence was wholly circumstantial and did not exclude every other reasonable hypothesis except his guilt. As the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict, we affirm.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, 1 the evidence shows that Holland was employed as a truck driver for Fletcher Enterprises. On or about June 18,1998, Holland picked up a load of 25 rolls of carpet from Dunlap, Tennessee, which he was to deliver to Philco…