Legal Opinion

Porter v. Russell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1946Published

1Per curiam

This is an action by the Price Administrator under subdivision (e) of section 205 of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 925, subd. [e]), to recover treble the amount by which the consideration paid by a purchaser of a Mack tractor for commercial use exceeded the applicable maximum price. Delivery was completed on May 18, 1943. The action was commenced May 17, j 944. Pending the trial the statute involved was amended by the Federal Stabilization Extension Act of 1944 (58 U. S. Stat. 640, § 108, subds. [b], [c]), the amendments being made applicable to all…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API