Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Prothro

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 24, 1992No. 66,961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

Dasie M. Dixon (plaintiff-appellant) appeals the trial court’s granting of an additur increasing the jury’s verdict against David L. Prothro (defendant-appellee) instead of granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

On February 27, 1985, cars driven by Dasie M. Dixon and David L. Prothro were involved in an automobile accident in Wichita, Kansas. Dixon filed suit against Prothro for damages causéd by the accident.

At trial, the jury found that Dixon was 49 percent at fault for the accident and Prothro was 51 percent at fault. In addition, the jury found that Dixon sustained the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Fay v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Walker v. SauvinetSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Kansas State Bank & Trust Co. v. Specialized Transportation Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. Edwards v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dixon v. ProthroSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Tuley v. City of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
  3. Zaragoza v. Board of Johnson County Comm'rsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API