Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Siegfried

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1935No. File No. 6375PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

The plaintiff alleges the breach of a certain contract, known as Exhibit B., and executed October 1, 1924.

This paragraph is the crux of the controversy: “For valuable consideration to and from both parties, said Harry E. Siegfried agrees to take over'three mortgages now existing against the hereinafter described real property and agrees to convert the same into one mortgage, the principal sum of which shall be the amount due on the said three mortgages at the date of this agreement, with interest at seven per cent (7%) per annum until fully paid, said mortgage to run for a term of ten (10)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erickson v. WiperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. First State Bank v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Kramer v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Schultz v. Plankinton BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Alsterberg v. BennettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ell v. EllNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Schue v. JacobyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Larson v. WoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Hanes v. MitchellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Northwestern Equipment, Inc. v. TentisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API