Thomas v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
COBB, Judge.
The defendant, Paul Louis Thomas, was tried for robbery. At trial defense counsel moved for the court to allow Thomas to display his upper body to the jury without subjecting himself to cross-examination. One of the robbery victims previously had testified that she observed no marks, tattoos, or chest hair on the shirtless robber. The motion was denied and the defendant was convicted.
On appeal it is contended that denial of the motion for the defendant to silently exhibit his torso to the jury was reversible error. The argument is that such a physical exhibition, had it been…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Castor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Meltzer v. C. Buck LeCraw & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MacIas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Wells v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985