Legal Opinion

State v. Abdallah

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 2001No. 2-01-165-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLMAN, Justice.

The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting Appellee Osama M. Abdal-lah’s motion to quash the information in this case for failure to allege a culpable mental state. In its sole point, the State argues that the trial court abused its discretion in granting Appellee’s motion to quash because (1) the information tracks the language of the statute and is therefore sufficient; and (2) the statute criminalizing the conduct “plainly dispenses with” any mental element. We affirm the trial court’s order.

Procedural Background

Appellee was charged under section…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Ex Parte WeiseCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Telia D. Casel v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  2. Tate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. State v. Walker, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2006
  4. Mikeal Wayne Tate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  5. Mikeal Wayne Tate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API