Legal Opinion

Kirksey v. Geer

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 3, 1923No. 14998; 14999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

In each of the above-stated cases the petition for mandamus, praying that this court compel the trial judge to certify a bill of exceptions, shows that the fine imposed by the court was paid by the movant after the refusal of the judge to sign the bill of exceptions. The cases, therefore, have become moot, and the applications for mandamus are denied. This is true although the sentence in each case was that unless the defendant paid the fine he must serve a certain number of months in the chain-gang, and although the movant alleges that on the next day after the refusal of the judge to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cook v. LowrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Leverette v. KilpatrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. Johnson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Hoard v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Giles v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. Blakey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API